Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Fri, 2005-12-16 at 23:13 +0000, David Howells wrote:
This patch set does the following:
(1) Renames DECLARE_MUTEX and DECLARE_MUTEX_LOCKED to be DECLARE_SEM_MUTEX and
DECLARE_SEM_MUTEX_LOCKED for counting semaphores.
Could we really get rid of that "MUTEX" part. A counting semaphore is
_not_ a mutex, although a mutex _is_ a counting semaphore. As is a Jack
Russell is a dog, but a dog is not a Jack Russell.
Really?
A Jack Russell is a dog because anything you say about a dog can
also be said about a Jack Russell.
A counting semaphore is a mutex for the same reason (and observe
that 99% of users use the semaphore as a mutex). A mutex definitely
is not a counting semaphore. David's implementation of mutexes
don't count at all.
If you want to use a semaphore as a mutex, DECLARE_SEM_MUTEX isn't
a terrible name.
--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
