Re: [PATCH 0/3] *at syscalls: Intro

On 12/16/05, Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]> wrote:
> Jim Meyering wrote:
> > FYI, the rm in coreutils-cvs is finally thread-safe and race-free,
> > when using openat et al.
>
> Actually, Jim, I doubt it.

You seem to have misread.  I mentioned only `rm'.
I know full well that the other dir-traversing tools are not as robust.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH 0/3] *at syscalls: Intro
  - From: Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] *at syscalls: Intro
  - From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] *at syscalls: Intro
  - From: Jim Meyering <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] *at syscalls: Intro
  - From: Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Fwd: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks
Next by Date: Re: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/3] *at syscalls: Intro
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/3] *at syscalls: Intro
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]