On Friday 16 December 2005 16:49, you wrote: > > and leaves time for the broadcom driver developers to finish, merge > > and push to the distributions their driver > > It's working partially now. This is the time when we should really > try to force ndiswrapper junkies over to the driver to get it tested > and bugfixed for inclusion. Partially means: - Connections on CCK Rates (802.11b) are stable, if the signal quality is good (you are close to the AP). - No encryption support, yet (I am working on it, but it's a bit difficult) Now, I want to test bcm43xx on 4k stacks. But only have a ppc32 machine with such a broadcom card. ppc32 has 8k stacks. How am I supposed to test the driver for 4kstack conformance? Given this, why aren't there people working on 4kstacks for ppc32? Is it not needed there, or did simply nobody care to do this now? Thanks for your nonflaming suggestions. ;) -- Greetings Michael.
Attachment:
pgpRT1aKIuMVB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks
- References:
- [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks
- From: Diego Calleja <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks
- From: Kyle Moffett <[email protected]>
- [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks
- Prev by Date: Re: Problems in the SiS IDE driver
- Next by Date: Re: Problems in the SiS IDE driver
- Previous by thread: Re: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks
- Next by thread: Re: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks
- Index(es):