Re: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks

Hi Alex,

On 12/16/05, Alex Davis <[email protected]> wrote:
> I understand that, and am grateful for the effort, but the point is it's not ready. Are you
> expecting people to lose an important feature of their
> laptop until you get the driver ready?

Hey, it's the price you pay for using binary only drivers. Why not
complain to Broadcom instead for not releasing the hardware
documentation? Besides, you can still maintain 8 KB stacks as an
out-of-tree patch or change fix ndiswrapper work with 4 KB ones.

                              Pekka
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks
    • From: Dave Jones <[email protected]>
  • Re: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks
    • From: Alex Davis <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario
• Next by Date: Re: Semantics of smp_mb() [was : Re: [PATCH] Fix RCU race in access of nohz_cpu_mask ]
• Previous by thread: Re: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks
• Next by thread: Re: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]