From: "Lee Revell" <[email protected]>
There are 10 drivers that udelay(10000) or more and a TON that udelay(1000). Turning those all into 1ms+ non preemptible sections will be very bad.
What about 100usec non-preemptible sections? John Hawkes - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] ia64: disable preemption in udelay()
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] ia64: disable preemption in udelay()
- From: Zwane Mwaikambo <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] ia64: disable preemption in udelay()
- References:
- [PATCH] ia64: disable preemption in udelay()
- From: [email protected]
- Re: [PATCH] ia64: disable preemption in udelay()
- From: "Luck, Tony" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] ia64: disable preemption in udelay()
- From: Zwane Mwaikambo <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] ia64: disable preemption in udelay()
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] ia64: disable preemption in udelay()
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] TCP/IP Critical socket communication mechanism
- Next by Date: RE: drivers/mtd/onenand/: unacceptable stack usage
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] ia64: disable preemption in udelay()
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] ia64: disable preemption in udelay()
- Index(es):
 |