On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 02:50:40PM -0800, Luck, Tony wrote:
> This does make the function a bit big for an "inline" though. Does
> it really need to be inline? Do we care how fast our delay loops
> are?
Moving the current slim-line udelay() out of line would save 41 Kbytes
of text in the generic vmlinux, plus making any modules that use
udelay smaller too. Savings run from a 128-160 bytes for drivers
with just one call to a max of 9 Kbytes for qla2xxx.ko.
Being out-of-line would reduce accuracy, but this would only be
significant when the sleep is for a very small number of microseconds.
So if we need to add more code to udelay(), I think that it
should be moved out-of-line too (into arch/ia64/kernel/time.c).
alpha, m68knommu, powerpc and sh64 already have out of line udelay().
-Tony
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
