> So are you suggesting I use alloc_bootmem_node and allocate PDA for > NR_CPUS? Continue to allocate the boot PDA of the BP statically - this should be ok because BP should be always on node 0 (or if you're paranoid about it you could also reallocate, but it's probably not needed) And for the APs you allocate the PDA in smpboot.c before actually sending the startup IPI to the AP. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [discuss] [patch 3/3] x86_64: Node local pda take 2 -- node local pda allocation
- From: Ravikiran G Thirumalai <[email protected]>
- Re: [discuss] [patch 3/3] x86_64: Node local pda take 2 -- node local pda allocation
- References:
- [patch 1/3] x86_64: Node local pda take 2 -- early cpu_to_node
- From: Ravikiran G Thirumalai <[email protected]>
- [patch 3/3] x86_64: Node local pda take 2 -- node local pda allocation
- From: Ravikiran G Thirumalai <[email protected]>
- Re: [discuss] [patch 3/3] x86_64: Node local pda take 2 -- node local pda allocation
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [discuss] [patch 3/3] x86_64: Node local pda take 2 -- node local pda allocation
- From: Ravikiran G Thirumalai <[email protected]>
- [patch 1/3] x86_64: Node local pda take 2 -- early cpu_to_node
- Prev by Date: Re: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks
- Next by Date: Re: [discuss] [patch 1/3] x86_64: Node local pda take 2 -- early cpu_to_node
- Previous by thread: Re: [discuss] [patch 3/3] x86_64: Node local pda take 2 -- node local pda allocation
- Next by thread: Re: [discuss] [patch 3/3] x86_64: Node local pda take 2 -- node local pda allocation
- Index(es):
 |