[PATCH] i386,amd64: mmconfig __iomem annotations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Signed-off-by: Al Viro <[email protected]>


---

 arch/i386/pci/mmconfig.c   |    2 +-
 arch/x86_64/pci/mmconfig.c |   14 +++++++-------
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

2e9fa139a1fc14c8cb26fae0bcb31ecc73811f6f
diff --git a/arch/i386/pci/mmconfig.c b/arch/i386/pci/mmconfig.c
index 08a0849..70a9cc1 100644
--- a/arch/i386/pci/mmconfig.c
+++ b/arch/i386/pci/mmconfig.c
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ static __init void unreachable_devices(v
 		addr = get_base_addr(0, 0, PCI_DEVFN(i, 0));
 		if (addr != 0)
 			pci_exp_set_dev_base(addr, 0, PCI_DEVFN(i, 0));
-		if (addr == 0 || readl((u32 *)addr) != val1)
+		if (addr == 0 || readl((u32 __iomem *)addr) != val1)
 			set_bit(i, fallback_slots);
 		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pci_config_lock, flags);
 	}
diff --git a/arch/x86_64/pci/mmconfig.c b/arch/x86_64/pci/mmconfig.c
index 9c4f907..f16c0d5 100644
--- a/arch/x86_64/pci/mmconfig.c
+++ b/arch/x86_64/pci/mmconfig.c
@@ -18,11 +18,11 @@ static DECLARE_BITMAP(fallback_slots, 32
 /* Static virtual mapping of the MMCONFIG aperture */
 struct mmcfg_virt {
 	struct acpi_table_mcfg_config *cfg;
-	char *virt;
+	char __iomem *virt;
 };
 static struct mmcfg_virt *pci_mmcfg_virt;
 
-static char *get_virt(unsigned int seg, unsigned bus)
+static char __iomem *get_virt(unsigned int seg, unsigned bus)
 {
 	int cfg_num = -1;
 	struct acpi_table_mcfg_config *cfg;
@@ -43,9 +43,9 @@ static char *get_virt(unsigned int seg, 
 	}
 }
 
-static char *pci_dev_base(unsigned int seg, unsigned int bus, unsigned int devfn)
+static char __iomem *pci_dev_base(unsigned int seg, unsigned int bus, unsigned int devfn)
 {
-	char *addr;
+	char __iomem *addr;
 	if (seg == 0 && bus == 0 && test_bit(PCI_SLOT(devfn), &fallback_slots))
 		return NULL;
 	addr = get_virt(seg, bus);
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ static char *pci_dev_base(unsigned int s
 static int pci_mmcfg_read(unsigned int seg, unsigned int bus,
 			  unsigned int devfn, int reg, int len, u32 *value)
 {
-	char *addr;
+	char __iomem *addr;
 
 	/* Why do we have this when nobody checks it. How about a BUG()!? -AK */
 	if (unlikely(!value || (bus > 255) || (devfn > 255) || (reg > 4095)))
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static int pci_mmcfg_read(unsigned int s
 static int pci_mmcfg_write(unsigned int seg, unsigned int bus,
 			   unsigned int devfn, int reg, int len, u32 value)
 {
-	char *addr;
+	char __iomem *addr;
 
 	/* Why do we have this when nobody checks it. How about a BUG()!? -AK */
 	if (unlikely((bus > 255) || (devfn > 255) || (reg > 4095)))
@@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ static __init void unreachable_devices(v
 	int i;
 	for (i = 0; i < 32; i++) {
 		u32 val1;
-		char *addr;
+		char __iomem *addr;
 
 		pci_conf1_read(0, 0, PCI_DEVFN(i,0), 0, 4, &val1);
 		if (val1 == 0xffffffff)
-- 
0.99.9.GIT

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux