Re: [2.6 patch] offer CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE only if EXPERIMENTAL

From: Dave Jones <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 19:40:06 -0500

> [1] In that particular case, it was broken asm-x86-64/ macros that 
>     just happened to work at -O2 by chance, so it actually found latent bugs.

I'm hoping it's something similar on sparc64.

I have the problem narrowed down to compiling kernel/sched.o with
"-Os" on sparc64.  Let's see if I can zero in on the exact problem
quickly...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [2.6 patch] offer CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE only if EXPERIMENTAL
    • From: Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>
  • Re: [2.6 patch] offer CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE only if EXPERIMENTAL
    • From: Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>
  • Re: [2.6 patch] offer CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE only if EXPERIMENTAL
    • From: Dave Jones <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] TCP/IP Critical socket communication mechanism
• Next by Date: Re: Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario
• Previous by thread: Re: [2.6 patch] offer CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE only if EXPERIMENTAL
• Next by thread: Re: [2.6 patch] offer CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE only if EXPERIMENTAL
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]