Re: tsc clock issues with dual core and question about irq balancing

["Adrian Yee" <brewt-linux-kernel@brewt.org>]

Hi Jeff,

>> My other question is about irq balancing - I turned it on, but it
>> doesn't seem to be working properly:
>>
>>            CPU0       CPU1
>>   0:     109208        975    IO-APIC-edge  timer
>>   1:       1226         10    IO-APIC-edge  i8042
>>   8:     275272          1    IO-APIC-edge  rtc
>>   9:          0          0   IO-APIC-level  acpi
>>  12:       4133          4    IO-APIC-edge  i8042
>>  14:       5135          8    IO-APIC-edge  ide0
>>  15:         17          8    IO-APIC-edge  ide1
>>  16:      25084          1   IO-APIC-level  eth0
>>  17:      43597          1   IO-APIC-level  eth1
>>  18:        185          5   IO-APIC-level  libata
>>  19:          0          0   IO-APIC-level  libata
>>  20:      11525          1   IO-APIC-level  EMU10K1
>>  21:      24870          1   IO-APIC-level  nvidia
>> NMI:          0          0
>> LOC:     110119     110118
>> ERR:          0
>> MIS:          0
>
> I think there is an irqbalance userspace daemon.

According to debian's package description for the irq balance package:

"Daemon to balance irq's across multiple CPUs on systems with the 2.4 or
2.6 kernel. This can lead to better performance and IO balance on SMP
systems. Useful mostly just for 2.4 kernels, or 2.6 kernels with
CONFIG_IRQBALANCE turned off."

I have the CONFIG_IRQBALANCE option turned on, so it should be balancing
the irq's itself; is it not?  Would there even be any benefit from
balancing the irq's with a single dual core processor?  Thanks.

Adrian
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/