Re: [2.6 patch] offer CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE only if EXPERIMENTAL

[Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>]

On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 03:32:28PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> 
> On Wed, 14 Dec 2005, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > 
> > My patch has the advantage that it doesn't allow the broken 
> > CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=y setting on ARM if !EXPERIMENTAL.
> 
> That isn't how it was before either. 
> 
> Before, it _asked_ you if EMBEDDED was set, and "y" was just the default 
> (but you could select "n" if you wanted to). I don't think it's 
> necessarily wrong to allow a -O2 ARM or H8300 kernel, although apparently 
> there are compilers that are broken that way too..
> 
> So my patch should give the old behaviour for the EMBEDDED platforms, and 
> _allow_ it for non-embedded unless SPARC64 is set, or EXPERIMENTAL isn't 
> set.
>...

No, your patch allows ARM users to set CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=n no matter 
whether they have any options set.

Before, ARM users had to set EMBEDDED=y, and with my patch they would 
have to set EXPERIMENTAL=y for getting this broken configuration.


config CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE
	bool "Optimize for size (Look out for broken compilers!)"
	default y
	depends on ARM || H8300 || EXPERIMENTAL


does allow CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=n if ARM=y and EXPERIMENTAL=n
(which was reported as being broken).


config CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE
	bool "Optimize for size (EXPERIMENTAL)" if EXPERIMENTAL
	default y if ARM || H8300

does not allow CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=n if ARM=y and EXPERIMENTAL=n.

> 		Linus

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/