Re: [PATCH 4/6] FS_NOATIME for ocfs

Christoph Hellwig wrote:

Although I think ocfs should still go into 2.6.15 a an additional driver
that stands on it's own..


I ACK the inclusion of ocfs as well, but not in 2.6.15.

Standalone or not, we don't need to set an example of including newfeatures at the last minute. That just encourages other folks to submitnew features at the last minute. Which leads to lack of review, andunnecessary last minute work for some. Do that enough times, and you'llbe seeing reiser4 sent to Linus 24 hours before each -final release :)


	Jeff





-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH 4/6] FS_NOATIME for ocfs
  - From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [2.6 patch] offer CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE only if EXPERIMENTAL
Next by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] TCP/IP Critical socket communication mechanism
Previous by thread: [PATCH 4/6] FS_NOATIME for ocfs
Next by thread: [PATCH 6/6] per-mount noatime and nodiratime
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]