On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 12:19:01PM +1000, Douglas Gilbert wrote: > I used to think that SCSI was the most maligned part of the > linux kernel, but that no longer seems to be the case. > Can ACPI be really that bad ... Yes. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- From: Matthew Garrett <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- From: Erik Slagter <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- From: Erik Slagter <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- From: Erik Slagter <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- From: Douglas Gilbert <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- Prev by Date: Re: [patch 00/21] hrtimer - High-resolution timer subsystem
- Next by Date: Re: tsc clock issues with dual core and question about irq balancing
- Previous by thread: Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- Next by thread: Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- Index(es):
 |