Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/6] Critical Page Pool

On Mer, 2005-12-14 at 08:37 -0800, Matthew Dobson wrote:
> Actually, Sridhar's code (mentioned earlier in this thread) *does* drop
> incoming packets that are not 'critical', but unfortunately you need to

I realise that but if you look at the previous history in 2.0 and 2.2
this was all that was ever needed. It thus begs the question why all the
extra support and logic this time around ?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [RFC][PATCH 0/6] Critical Page Pool
    • From: Matthew Dobson <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/6] Critical Page Pool
    • From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/6] Critical Page Pool
    • From: Andrea Arcangeli <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/6] Critical Page Pool
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/6] Critical Page Pool
    • From: Matthew Dobson <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH/RFC] SPI: add DMAUNSAFE analog to David Brownell's core
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH/RFC] SPI: add DMAUNSAFE analog to David Brownell's core
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/6] Critical Page Pool
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/6] Critical Page Pool
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]