Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation

Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> wrote:

> I can't see how your code actually detects the over-upping, although it's 
> fairly obvious how it would be done. Did you miss one patch for this?

If owner is NULL, then you've probably upped twice.

David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
    • From: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
    • From: David Howells <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Cpuset: rcu optimization of page alloc hook
• Next by Date: Re: set_page_dirty vs set_page_dirty_lock
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]