Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation

Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> wrote:

> I can't see how your code actually detects the over-upping, although it's 
> fairly obvious how it would be done. Did you miss one patch for this?

If owner is NULL, then you've probably upped twice.

David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
  - From: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
  - From: David Howells <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Cpuset: rcu optimization of page alloc hook
Next by Date: Re: set_page_dirty vs set_page_dirty_lock
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]