Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation

Actually a PS to this while I think about it. spin_locks and mutex type
locks could both do with a macro for

	call_locked(&lock, foo(a,b,c,d))

to cut down on all the error path forgot to release a lock type errors.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
  - From: Nikita Danilov <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
  - From: David Howells <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
  - From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
Next by Date: [PATCH] ext2: trivial indentation fix.
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]