Re: [RFC][PATCH] Prevent overriding of Symbols in the Kernel, avoiding Undefined behaviour

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 22:48 +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Llu, 2005-12-12 at 11:13 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Do we really need to do this at runtime?  We could check this when building
> > module depoendencies (for example).  That'll be a 95% solution..
> 
> Its almost the 0% solution. The kernel as shipped doesn't seem to have
> any clashing symbols like this. The two sets of cases people report are 
> 
> 1. Out of tree modules

these need to (re)run depmod anyway, and they do in general

> 2. Reconfiguring, rebuilding something from kernel to module and not
> cleaning up

which runs depmod as well


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux