On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 09:22:42AM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> writes:
> >
> > in the past couple of years i saw double-faults at a rate of perhaps
> > once a year - and i frequently hack lowlevel glue code! So the
> > usefulness of this code in the field, and especially on an embedded
> > platforms, is extremely limited.
>
> If it only saves an hour or developer time on some bug report
> it has already justified its value.
>
> Also to really save memory there are much better areas
> of attack than this relatively slim code.
Such as? Odds are good I've already attacked them, but I'd be happy
for some new ideas.
I think anything easily disabled larger than 1k is a pretty decent
target in a minimal config.
> -Andi (who sees double faults more often)
You will *not* see them on a platform with no console and no printk,
hence CONFIG_EMBEDDED. Can we be done with this yet?
--
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
