Re: [PATCH] move pm_power_off and pm_idle declaration to common code

[Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>]

> > So move declaration of pm_power_off (and with it pm_idle) from the
> > archs that do define it to kernel/sys.c.  This should fix the link
> > problem, and at the same time remove some duplication.
> 
> Sounds sane.  
> 
> Does powerpc still build?  A key question is how do we handle architectures
> that always want to want to call machine_power_off.

I didn't (and can't) check, but it should.  IIRC multiple declaration
of a variable is OK, as long as at most one has an initializer.

Miklos
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/