Re: [PATCH 3/3] [kconfig] Direct use of lxdialog routines by menuconfig

[Petr Baudis <pasky@ucw.cz>]

Dear diary, on Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 04:18:26AM CET, I got a letter
where Kurt Wall <kwallinator@gmail.com> said that...
> On Sunday 11 December 2005 07:46 pm, Petr Baudis wrote:
> > After three years, the zombie walks again!  This patch (against the latest
> > git tree) cleans up interaction between kconfig's mconf (menuconfig
> > frontend) and lxdialog. Its commandline interface disappears in this patch,
> > instead a .so is packed from the lxdialog objects and the relevant
> > functions are called directly from mconf.
> 
> > @@ -808,18 +684,22 @@ static void conf(struct menu *menu)
> >     }
> >     break;
> >    case 4:
> > -   if (type == 't')
> > +   if (active_type == 't')
> >      sym_set_tristate_value(sym, no);
> >     break;
> >    case 5:
> > -   if (type == 't')
> > +   if (active_type == 't')
> >      sym_set_tristate_value(sym, mod);
> >     break;
> >    case 6:
> > -   if (type == 't')
> > +   if (active_type == 't') {
> >      sym_toggle_tristate_value(sym);
> > -   else if (type == 'm')
> > -    conf(submenu);
> > +   } else if (active_type == 'm') {
> > +    if (single_menu_mode)
> > +     submenu->data = (void *) !submenu->data;
> 
> Shouldn't this be:
>      submenu->data = (void *) (long) !submenu->data;

You are right, it should be so at least for consistency - it'll be fixed
in the next resend of the patch. I can't see why is it needed, though -
shouldn't the int be padded to void* anyway?

-- 
				Petr "Pasky" Baudis
Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/
VI has two modes: the one in which it beeps and the one in which
it doesn't.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/