Re: [PATCH] alpha build pm_power_off hack

Eric wrote:
> Taking a quick glance at alpha causes me to think we always
> want pm_power_off to be non null on alpha.

So I presume you think that some alpha person should write
such a function?

I can't quite guess whether you are agreeing with my patch,
or disagreeing with it.

At the very least, I don't want to leave the crosstools build
of alpha with a default config broken.

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <[email protected]> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] alpha build pm_power_off hack
  - From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)

References:
- [PATCH] alpha build pm_power_off hack
  - From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] alpha build pm_power_off hack
  - From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Cpuset: rcu optimization of page alloc hook
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Fix RCU race in access of nohz_cpu_mask
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] alpha build pm_power_off hack
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] alpha build pm_power_off hack
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]