Re: [PATCH] Cpuset: rcu optimization of page alloc hook

> Thanks to Andi Kleen and Nick Piggin for the suggestion.

Thanks. But i guess it would be still a good idea to turn
ia "check that there is no cpuset" test into an inline
so that it can be done without a function call. Only when
it fails call the out of line cpuset full checking function.

This would make the common case of a kernel with cpuset
compiled in but nobody using it faster.

This could be done even without any memory barriers of
any kind.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] Cpuset: rcu optimization of page alloc hook
    • From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] Cpuset: rcu optimization of page alloc hook
    • From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: set_page_dirty vs set_page_dirty_lock
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/1] usb/input: Add fn key to hid-debug.h
• Previous by thread: [PATCH] Cpuset: rcu optimization of page alloc hook
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Cpuset: rcu optimization of page alloc hook
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]