Re: GNU/Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario

["Jeff V. Merkey" <jmerkey@wolfmountaingroup.com>]

Richard M. Stallman wrote:

> --text follows this line--
>      I would be happy to propose several changes in future revisions.
>    Let me know where, when, and what to provide.  You can be assured
>    I'll provide some very excellent input on these issues.
>
> We accepting comments on the first public draft of GNU GPL v3 once it
> is made public on Jan 16.
>
> See gplv3.fsf.org for more information about how this will work.
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
>  
You can be assured I will submit proposed changes.  Something along the 
same lines as the CDDL.  Needs to protect
receivers of the code from IP claims and also needs to accomodate mixing 
of non-GPL components without
contaminating add on modules and functionality.  I would use the GPL if 
it were more acceptable along these
lines.  In case you haven't noticed, I don't have problem being 
outspoken, nor do I am subject to intimination
by the more vocal element of the FOSS community.  I am using the CDDL at 
present but a revised and more
capitalism oriented GPL would certainly be welcome.

I'll sharpen my pencil.

Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/