Re: [patch -mm] fix SLOB on x64

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Matt Mackall <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 03:12:17PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > this patch fixes 32-bitness bugs in mm/slob.c. Successfully booted x64 
> > with SLOB enabled. (i have switched the PREEMPT_RT feature to use the 
> > SLOB allocator exclusively, so it must work on all platforms)
> 
> The patch looks fine, but what's this about using SLOB exclusively?  
> Fragmentation performance of SLOB is miserable on anything like a 
> modern desktop, I think SLOB only makes sense for small machines. The 
> locking also suggests dual core at most.

well, this is only an -rt artifact: the SLOB needs zero modifications to 
work on PREEMPT_RT, while SLAB needed a risky 66K monster patch. Until 
someone simplifies the SLAB conversion to PREEMPT_RT, i'll use the SLOB.

i havent noticed any significant slowdown due to the SLOB. In any case, 
we'll give it some workout which should further speed up its upstream 
integration - it's looking good so far.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux