Sorry to continue this OT thread.
Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
"constructive" is a for profit model that sustains the hi tech
industry. The current
models have created a conduit for socialist disintegration of the
american hi tech
markets, loss of jobs, and have funnelled technology out of the
country. Legal
defense funds should be the biggest red flags of all. If this system
you devised really
works, why all the litigation? Why all the need for legal defense funds
and patent
infringement insurance? I've watched the entire market slowly collapse
over the years
as the result of the affect of the GPL on America's hi tech markets.
It isn't working, and it isn't sustainable. non-profit and "temples" of
GPL "religion"
have evolved, with the leaders living in orgnaizations that subsist from
handouts and
donations. This movement has spawned a global attitude that has no
respect
for IP rights, and it's extended itself to no respect for human rights,
or any other rights
of the indivdual. That's the legacy this has left and the ultimate
conclusion.
If you are totally against "socialist" licenses and the OSS movement,
what are you doing on this mailing list? I rather doubt many people here
share your views, and I seriously doubt that you are going to convince
anyone to change their viewpoints.
I suspect you are simply trolling, and I suppose I am taking the bait.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
