Re: [patch 3/17] s390: move s390_root_dev_* out of the cio layer.

On Fri, 2005-12-09 at 17:51 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 04:23:45PM +0100, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> > +extern struct device *s390_root_dev_register(const char *);
> > +extern void s390_root_dev_unregister(struct device *);
> >...
> 
> If you do _really_ need these wrappers, simply make them
> "static inline"'s in the header file.

We can't. The point here is that we need an external release function
that is still available after the module has been unloaded that uses
these wrappers.

-- 
blue skies,
   Martin

Martin Schwidefsky
Linux for zSeries Development & Services
IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [patch 3/17] s390: move s390_root_dev_* out of the cio layer.
    • From: Greg KH <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [patch 3/17] s390: move s390_root_dev_* out of the cio layer.
    • From: Martin Schwidefsky <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 3/17] s390: move s390_root_dev_* out of the cio layer.
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch 3/17] s390: move s390_root_dev_* out of the cio layer.
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH][mm] swsusp: limit image size
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch 3/17] s390: move s390_root_dev_* out of the cio layer.
• Next by thread: Re: [patch 3/17] s390: move s390_root_dev_* out of the cio layer.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]