On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 11:42:46AM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > As a concept it's _much_ better. Although it should be platform_scsi_init > and every architecture would provide an, in most cases noop, implementation. How about if (platform_scsi_init) platform_scsi_init(&scsi_bus_type); ? This is similar to how the platform_notify callback code is handled. Making it per-arch isn't quite ideal, since x86 can be ACPI or APM and kernels need support for both. On the other hand, I can't think of any way that APM could do anything useful with the information, so per-arch may be reasonable. -- Matthew Garrett | [email protected] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- References:
- Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- From: Matthew Garrett <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- From: Matthew Garrett <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- From: Matthew Garrett <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- From: Matthew Garrett <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- From: Matthew Garrett <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- Prev by Date: Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- Next by Date: [PATCH] sparc32 block needed in final image link build fix
- Previous by thread: Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- Next by thread: Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- Index(es):