On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 12:35:27PM +0100, Erik Slagter wrote: > I case this (still) isn't clear, I am addressing the attitude of "It's > ACPI so it's not going to be used, period". We're not gonna patch support for any braindead firmware interface into the scsi midlayer (and trust me, there's a shitload more of them than just acpi). Now please sod off. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- From: Matthew Garrett <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- From: Erik Slagter <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- From: Erik Slagter <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- From: Erik Slagter <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- From: Erik Slagter <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- Prev by Date: Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- Next by Date: Re: [ACPI] Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- Previous by thread: Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- Next by thread: Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- Index(es):
 |