On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 10:15:51AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > It's a possible way to address this, but I'd rather just set a flag > indicating that the last-whatever values should not be considered (to > get into a state just like after initial boot). Jan Sounds reasonable. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- 2.6.15-rc5-mm1
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- [discuss] Re: 2.6.15-rc5-mm1 (x86_64-hpet-overflow.patch breaks resume from disk)
- From: "Jan Beulich" <[email protected]>
- Re: [discuss] Re: 2.6.15-rc5-mm1 (x86_64-hpet-overflow.patch breaks resume from disk)
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.15-rc5-mm1 (x86_64-hpet-overflow.patch breaks resume from disk)
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.15-rc5-mm1 (x86_64-hpet-overflow.patch breaks resume from disk)
- From: "Jan Beulich" <[email protected]>
- 2.6.15-rc5-mm1
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.15-rc5-mm1 (x86_64-hpet-overflow.patch breaks resume from disk)
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Reduce number of pointer derefs in various files (kernel/exit.c used as example)
- Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.15-rc5-mm1 (x86_64-hpet-overflow.patch breaks resume from disk)
- Next by thread: Re: 2.6.15-rc5-mm1 (x86_64-hpet-overflow.patch breaks resume from disk)
- Index(es):
 |