On Iau, 2005-12-08 at 14:43 +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote: > ACPI methods belong to SATA/PATA targets, not PCI devices. The > notification you get is something of the form > > \SB.PCI.IDE0.SEC.MASTER That is fine. Given struct ata_port * you can get channel = ap->hard_port_no pci device ptr = to_pci(ap->host_set->dev) And from the struct ata_device * slave = (adev->devno == 1) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- From: Matthew Garrett <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- From: Matthew Garrett <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- From: Matthew Garrett <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: [ACPI] Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: [ACPI] Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: [ACPI] Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: [ACPI] Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- From: Matthew Garrett <[email protected]>
- RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- Prev by Date: Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- Next by Date: Re: How to enable/disable security features on mmap() ?
- Previous by thread: Re: [ACPI] Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- Next by thread: Re: [ACPI] Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- Index(es):
 |