Re: Linux Hardware Quality Labs (was: Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario)

On Thursday 08 December 2005 18:23, Dirk Steuwer wrote:
> - hardware vendors pay someone, or provide source code themselves
> to be reviewed by apropriate kernel folks/bsd board...

The first part probably won't work too well.  The moment money is involved, 
financial pressure starts to come into play, and said person might be 
inclined to "overlook" things so to speak.  We want the second one in 
reality.  If it's supposed to work with linux, it better damn well be 
reviewed by the people that made it.

Chris White

Attachment: pgpEVnySPWRlt.pgp
Description: PGP signature

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Linux Hardware Quality Labs (was: Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario)
    • From: Dirk Steuwer <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Linux Hardware Quality Labs (was: Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario)
    • From: Felix Oxley <[email protected]>
  • Re: Linux Hardware Quality Labs (was: Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario)
    • From: Vadim Lobanov <[email protected]>
  • Re: Linux Hardware Quality Labs (was: Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario)
    • From: Dirk Steuwer <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH] x86_64: Fix collision between pmtimer and pit/hpet timekeeping
• Next by Date: Re: [RFC] ip / ifconfig redesign
• Previous by thread: Re: Linux Hardware Quality Labs (was: Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario)
• Next by thread: Re: Linux Hardware Quality Labs (was: Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]