Re: for_each_online_cpu broken ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Dave Jones <[email protected]>, Andi Kleen <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Subject: Re: for_each_online_cpu broken ?
From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 07:30:50 +0100
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]

> This was seen with a .15rc5-git1 kernel.
> Is this something still living in your x86-64 patchset or -mm ?

Only the change for less additional CPUs. 

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: for_each_online_cpu broken ?
  - From: Dave Jones <[email protected]>

References:
- for_each_online_cpu broken ?
  - From: Dave Jones <[email protected]>
- Re: for_each_online_cpu broken ?
  - From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: for_each_online_cpu broken ?
  - From: Dave Jones <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: for_each_online_cpu broken ?
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2.6-git] SPI core refresh
Previous by thread: Re: for_each_online_cpu broken ?
Next by thread: Re: for_each_online_cpu broken ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]

Powered by Linux