Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
I'll change this to return 0 on success, or -ENOMEM. Bit more
conventional, no?
Ok. That also allows the addition of other error conditions in the future.
Need to revise isolate_lru_page to reflect that.
I think this 'schedule_on_each_cpu(lru_add_drain_per_cpu, NULL);' will be used
by memory-hot-removing code and some other codes.
How about move this to swap.c and name as 'lru_add_drain_all()' ?
(but there is no other users now....)
-- Kame
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
