On Wed, 7 Dec 2005, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > Btw, what is the policy on placing EXPORT_SYMBOL(...). Should they all > go together (at the top or teh bottom) or after each symbol > definition? Right now platform.c mixes 2 styles... Not all grouped together (option 1 above), but yes, after each symbol definition (option 2 above)... is the current preference AFAIK. -- ~Randy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Minor change to platform_device_register_simple prototype
- From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
- Re: [PATCH] Minor change to platform_device_register_simple prototype
- References:
- [PATCH] Minor change to platform_device_register_simple prototype
- From: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
- Re: [PATCH] Minor change to platform_device_register_simple prototype
- From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
- Re: [PATCH] Minor change to platform_device_register_simple prototype
- From: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor_core@ameritech.net>
- Re: [PATCH] Minor change to platform_device_register_simple prototype
- From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
- Re: [PATCH] Minor change to platform_device_register_simple prototype
- From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
- [PATCH] Minor change to platform_device_register_simple prototype
- Prev by Date: Re: Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario
- Next by Date: RE: [RFC 1/3] Framework for accurate node based statistics
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Minor change to platform_device_register_simple prototype
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Minor change to platform_device_register_simple prototype
- Index(es):
![]() |