Hi,
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > A bit later ktime_t looked pretty much like the 64bit part of my
> > ktimespec.
>
> and Thomas credited you for that point in his announcement:
>
> " Roman pointed out that the penalty for some architectures
> would be quite big when using the nsec_t (64bit) scalar time
> storage format. "
"pointed out that the penalty" is a bit different from "provided the
basic idea of the ktime_t union and half the implementation"...
bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
