Re: RFC: Starting a stable kernel series off the 2.6 kernel

> The other group is the people who use and depend on some feature, be it 
> cryptoloop, 8k stacks, ndiswrapper, ipchains, whatever... which is 
> scheduled for extinction. 

these are actually 2 groups

1) people who depend on an in-kernel features

2) people who depend on out of kernel / binary modules

treating them as one is not correct or fair to this thread.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: RFC: Starting a stable kernel series off the 2.6 kernel
    • From: Horst von Brand <[email protected]>

• References:
  • RFC: Starting a stable kernel series off the 2.6 kernel
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
  • Re: RFC: Starting a stable kernel series off the 2.6 kernel
    • From: Mark Lord <[email protected]>
  • Re: RFC: Starting a stable kernel series off the 2.6 kernel
    • From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
  • Re: RFC: Starting a stable kernel series off the 2.6 kernel
    • From: Rob Landley <[email protected]>
  • Re: RFC: Starting a stable kernel series off the 2.6 kernel
    • From: Bill Davidsen <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: RFC: Starting a stable kernel series off the 2.6 kernel
• Next by Date: Re: [RFC]add ACPI hooks for IDE suspend/resume
• Previous by thread: Re: RFC: Starting a stable kernel series off the 2.6 kernel
• Next by thread: Re: RFC: Starting a stable kernel series off the 2.6 kernel
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]