> The other group is the people who use and depend on some feature, be it > cryptoloop, 8k stacks, ndiswrapper, ipchains, whatever... which is > scheduled for extinction. these are actually 2 groups 1) people who depend on an in-kernel features 2) people who depend on out of kernel / binary modules treating them as one is not correct or fair to this thread. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC: Starting a stable kernel series off the 2.6 kernel
- From: Horst von Brand <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC: Starting a stable kernel series off the 2.6 kernel
- References:
- RFC: Starting a stable kernel series off the 2.6 kernel
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC: Starting a stable kernel series off the 2.6 kernel
- From: Mark Lord <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC: Starting a stable kernel series off the 2.6 kernel
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC: Starting a stable kernel series off the 2.6 kernel
- From: Rob Landley <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC: Starting a stable kernel series off the 2.6 kernel
- From: Bill Davidsen <[email protected]>
- RFC: Starting a stable kernel series off the 2.6 kernel
- Prev by Date: Re: RFC: Starting a stable kernel series off the 2.6 kernel
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC]add ACPI hooks for IDE suspend/resume
- Previous by thread: Re: RFC: Starting a stable kernel series off the 2.6 kernel
- Next by thread: Re: RFC: Starting a stable kernel series off the 2.6 kernel
- Index(es):
 |