On Wed, 2005-12-07 at 08:52 -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-12-07 at 19:57 +0900, Takashi Sato wrote:
>
> > On my previous mail, I said that CONFIG_LBD should not determine
> > whether large single files is enabled. But after further
> > consideration, on such a small system that CONFIG_LBD is disabled,
> > using large filesystem over network seems to be very rare.
> > So I think that the type of i_blocks should be sector_t.
>
> ???? Where do you get this misinformation from?
Without some kind of counter-example, I would tend to agree with
Takashi. In what scenerio would someone build a kernel with CONFIG_LBD
disabled, yet would be needing to access files > 2TB across the network?
Shaggy
--
David Kleikamp
IBM Linux Technology Center
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
