On 12/7/05, Matthew Garrett <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 09:17:31AM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > > Isn't ide-io.c:ide_{start,complete}_power_step() enough? > > No. Why? :) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC]add ACPI hooks for IDE suspend/resume
- From: Matthew Garrett <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC]add ACPI hooks for IDE suspend/resume
- From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC]add ACPI hooks for IDE suspend/resume
- References:
- [RFC]add ACPI hooks for IDE suspend/resume
- From: Shaohua Li <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC]add ACPI hooks for IDE suspend/resume
- From: Matthew Garrett <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC]add ACPI hooks for IDE suspend/resume
- From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC]add ACPI hooks for IDE suspend/resume
- From: Matthew Garrett <[email protected]>
- [RFC]add ACPI hooks for IDE suspend/resume
- Prev by Date: Re: [patch 00/43] ktimer reworked
- Next by Date: Re: another nfs puzzle
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC]add ACPI hooks for IDE suspend/resume
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC]add ACPI hooks for IDE suspend/resume
- Index(es):
 |