Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH 00/10] usb-serial: Switches from spin lock to atomic_t.

>  Isn't it right? Is the URB write so fast that switching to atomic_t
> doesn't pay-off?

an atomic_t access and a spinlock are basically the same price... so
what's the payoff ?


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH 00/10] usb-serial: Switches from spin lock to atomic_t.
  - From: Luiz Fernando Capitulino <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH 00/10] usb-serial: Switches from spin lock to atomic_t.
  - From: Luiz Fernando Capitulino <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 00/10] usb-serial: Switches from spin lock to atomic_t.
  - From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 00/10] usb-serial: Switches from spin lock to atomic_t.
  - From: Eduardo Pereira Habkost <[email protected]>
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH 00/10] usb-serial: Switches from spin lock to atomic_t.
  - From: Oliver Neukum <[email protected]>
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH 00/10] usb-serial: Switches from spin lock to atomic_t.
  - From: Luiz Fernando Capitulino <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH 00/10] usb-serial: Switches from spin lock to atomic_t.
Next by Date: Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH 00/10] usb-serial: Switches from spin lock to atomic_t.
Previous by thread: Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH 00/10] usb-serial: Switches from spin lock to atomic_t.
Next by thread: Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH 00/10] usb-serial: Switches from spin lock to atomic_t.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]