Ingo Molnar wrote:
so i believe that: - 'struct ktimer', 'struct ktimeout' is in theory superior naming, compared to: - 'struct ptimer', 'struct timer_list'
Just curious -- why the "k" thing?Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com -
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch 00/21] hrtimer - High-resolution timer subsystem
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
- Re: [patch 00/21] hrtimer - High-resolution timer subsystem
- References:
- [patch 00/21] hrtimer - High-resolution timer subsystem
- From: tglx@linutronix.de
- Re: [patch 00/21] hrtimer - High-resolution timer subsystem
- From: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
- Re: [patch 00/21] hrtimer - High-resolution timer subsystem
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
- Re: [patch 00/21] hrtimer - High-resolution timer subsystem
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
- Re: [patch 00/21] hrtimer - High-resolution timer subsystem
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
- [patch 00/21] hrtimer - High-resolution timer subsystem
- Prev by Date: [PATCH 03/16] mm: supporting variables and functions for balanced zone aging
- Next by Date: [PATCH 02/16] mm: simplify kswapd reclaim code
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch 00/21] hrtimer - High-resolution timer subsystem
- Next by thread: Re: [patch 00/21] hrtimer - High-resolution timer subsystem
- Index(es):
 |