On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 11:44:43PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > Are we still reverse-engineering for interoperability when we > essentially want to duplicate a piece of software with identical > purpose? 8-) There's not just x86* and ia64 out there, interoperability with different archs isn't possible today. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario
- From: Brian Gerst <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario
- From: Andrea Arcangeli <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario
- From: Brian Gerst <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario
- From: Florian Weimer <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/8] Critical Page Pool
- Next by Date: Re: RFC: Starting a stable kernel series off the 2.6 kernel
- Previous by thread: Re: Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario
- Next by thread: Re: Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario
- Index(es):
 |