On Tue, 6 Dec 2005, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Maw, 2005-12-06 at 15:12 -0500, Brian Gerst wrote:
> > Alan Cox wrote:
> > > On Llu, 2005-12-05 at 09:34 -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > >
> > >>IMHO ndiswrapper can't claim legitimately to be GPL, so just
> > >>patch that.
> > >
> > >
> > > Actually it isnt so simple. Load ndiswrapper. Now load a GPL windows
> > > driver binary. I don't know if ndiswrapper itself could dig licenses out
> > > of windows modules but if so it could even conditionally taint.
> > >
> > > Alan
> >
> > On the other hand, if the windows driver were GPL then there wouldn't be
> > any barrier to writing a native driver.
>
> Sure, but the point was to demonstrate in a clear and logical fashion
> that ndiswrapper could be GPL.
> -
so it would be OK to run a windows NDIS driver on Linux,
by using ndiswrapper, as long as the windows NDIS driver is GPL?
Never mind its possible stack needs or who knows what else.
--
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
