* Greg KH: > What are we breaking that people are complaining so much about? > Specifics please. Drastic performance changes in certain pipe usage patterns. This was probably too early in the 2.6 series to count, though. There might be some subtle changes in the netfilter/routing interaction which break user configurations, but this still being tracked down (and maybe the any behavior is fine because it's unspecified; hard to tell). - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC: Starting a stable kernel series off the 2.6 kernel
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC: Starting a stable kernel series off the 2.6 kernel
- References:
- RFC: Starting a stable kernel series off the 2.6 kernel
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC: Starting a stable kernel series off the 2.6 kernel
- From: Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC: Starting a stable kernel series off the 2.6 kernel
- From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC: Starting a stable kernel series off the 2.6 kernel
- From: Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC: Starting a stable kernel series off the 2.6 kernel
- From: Matthias Andree <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC: Starting a stable kernel series off the 2.6 kernel
- From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- RFC: Starting a stable kernel series off the 2.6 kernel
- Prev by Date: Re: stat64 for over 2TB file returned invalid st_blocks
- Next by Date: Re: Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario
- Previous by thread: Re: Policy for reverting user ABI breaking patches was Re: RFC: Starting a stable kernel series off the 2.6 kernel
- Next by thread: Re: RFC: Starting a stable kernel series off the 2.6 kernel
- Index(es):
 |