On Tue, 2005-12-06 at 07:07 +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Most of those small companies who propose a Linux driver simply start
> by paying a student during summer for porting their
> windows/sco/whatever driver to linux. They think the job is done when
> he leaves. Unfortunately, they receive complaints 3 months later from
> users because the driver is broken and does not build. They don't have
> the resources to keep a permanent developer on it, and they quickly
> understand that Linux is just a "geek OS" and that it's the last time
> they release any driver.
If they hired someone who did a _proper_ job -- writing a fully portable
and maintainable driver which got merged into Linus' kernel, then this
scenario doesn't make much sense. In-kernel code does generally get
maintained as interfaces change.
Of course, maintaining a driver _outside_ the kernel tree is a
never-ending task -- but why would anybody ever want to do that?
--
dwmw2
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
