* Steven Rostedt: >> Hint: Any plan in a volunteer community that starts with "$BUSY_PEOPLE should >> do $THIS" fails. Any plan that starts with "I could do $THIS" at least has a >> chance. > > Actually, they are already maintaining 2.6.x.y, (x => 11, 12, ...) I think the 2.6.x.y series is no longer maintained once 2.6.x+1 has been released for some time (surely after 2.6.x+2). - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC: Starting a stable kernel series off the 2.6 kernel
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC: Starting a stable kernel series off the 2.6 kernel
- References:
- RFC: Starting a stable kernel series off the 2.6 kernel
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC: Starting a stable kernel series off the 2.6 kernel
- From: Florian Weimer <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC: Starting a stable kernel series off the 2.6 kernel
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC: Starting a stable kernel series off the 2.6 kernel
- From: Rob Landley <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC: Starting a stable kernel series off the 2.6 kernel
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- RFC: Starting a stable kernel series off the 2.6 kernel
- Prev by Date: Re: RFC: Starting a stable kernel series off the 2.6 kernel
- Next by Date: Re: swsusp performance problems in 2.6.15-rc3-mm1
- Previous by thread: Re: RFC: Starting a stable kernel series off the 2.6 kernel
- Next by thread: Re: RFC: Starting a stable kernel series off the 2.6 kernel
- Index(es):
 |