Re: Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario

Tim Bird wrote:
> I meant "handled in the worst possible way by
> the kernel developers".  It *is* possible to define
> stable APIs and have them used successfully.
> 
> POSIX is not the greatest example, but it seems
> to work OK.
Oops.  I should have said "the syscalls supporting POSIX"
to refer to the kernel binary API for applications.

=============================
Tim Bird
Architecture Group Chair, CE Linux Forum
Senior Staff Engineer, Sony Electronics
=============================

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario
    • From: Dave Airlie <[email protected]>
  • Re: Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario
    • From: Tim Bird <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario
• Next by Date: [patch 00/21] hrtimer - High-resolution timer subsystem
• Previous by thread: Re: Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario
• Next by thread: Re: Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]