Re: Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2005-12-05 at 21:19 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-12-05 at 18:26 +0000, Andrew Walrond wrote:
> > > On December 6th, 2005 the kernel developers en mass decide that binary
> > > modules are legally fine and also essential for the progress of linux,
> > 
> > Has anyone (influential) actually being toying with this idea? I hope not, but 
> > if they are, I'd like to know who to lobby...
> 
> http://git.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=e3c3374fbf7efe9487edc53cd10436ed641983aa


I think you're wrong on this. Not about thinking it should be reverted
per se, but in the big picture it's not linked to the scenario. One
export more or less doesn't matter at all. 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux