Re: [PATCH 2/13] Time: Reduced NTP Rework (part 2)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Fri, 2 Dec 2005, George Anzinger wrote:

> In a discusson aroung the leapsecond and how to disable it (some folks don't
> want the time jump) it came to light that, for the most part, this is unused
> code.  It requires that time be kept in UST to be useful and, from what I can
> tell, most folks keep time in their local timezone, thus, effectively,
> disableing the usage of the leapsecond correction (ntp figures this out and
> just says "no").  Possibly it is time to ask if we should keep this in the
> kernel at all.

I'm thinking about moving the leap second handling to a timer, with the 
new timer system it would be easy to set a timer for e.g. 23:59.59 and 
then set the time. This way it would be gone from the common path and it 
wouldn't matter that much anymore whether it's used or not.

bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux