On Sun, 04 Dec 2005, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-12-04 at 13:12 +0100, Matthias Andree wrote:
> > On Sat, 03 Dec 2005, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
> >
> > > These folks have nothing new to innovate here. The memory manager and VM
> > > gets revamped every other release. Exports get broken, binary only
> > > module compatibility busted every rev of the kernel. I spend weeks on
> >
> > Who cares for binary modules?
> >
> > It hurts however if external OSS modules are broken.
>
> then those modules should be submitted realistically. That's just best
> for everyone involved. Which modules in particular do you mean btw?
I meant the ipmi, smbus and copa modules by Fujitsu-Siemens.
They are provided in source form, but I just found out (reading the
headers and not just the lines that broke the compile) they are not open
source. Perhaps one should prod them to slap a modified-BSD or perhaps
GPL label onto their modules.
It seems you'd then maintain them after their submission? :-)
> It's rare even in the 2.6 tree to mass-break well written drivers. Just
> because it's a lot of work to fix all in kernel drivers up. But a fully
> stable API is also not good. My guess is that the drivers that break
> most are the ones using the not-right APIs (eg internals and such).
These use inter_module_get() (ok, inter_module_get_request isn't
difficult) and some #include headers that have moved around between
linux and asm directories.
--
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
