On Fri, 2005-12-02 at 23:28 -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Friday 02 December 2005 23:19, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > On Thursday 01 December 2005 19:12, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > > Meanwhile, as noone seems to use swbit in struct input_device_id,
> > > perhaps we can remove it for 2.6.15?
> > >
> >
> > Please take a look at drivers/input/keyboard/corgikbd.c
> >
>
> What I meant we do use EV_SW in the drivers and so it sould be part
> of input_device_id. Nobody uses ffbit or sndbit either and still
> they are present...
Sure. BUT it will break current users. I'm suggesting we jerk that
field out for 2.6.15, and reintroduce it for >= 2.6.16, when we can (1)
ensure everyone has a fixed module-init tools, or (2) make sure everyone
is using the module alias stuff, or both.
It seems the simplest solution, surely?
Rusty.
--
A bad analogy is like a leaky screwdriver -- Richard Braakman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
